4 ms·
Sounds grand, but it is not in scope. Instead, each citizen has a volition and a voice and a vote—with exceptions, and at personal expense. And as a humanitar
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Sounds grand, but it is not in scope.
Instead, each citizen has a volition and a voice and a vote—with exceptions, and at personal expense.
And as a humanitarian with reservations, I say tax the bots for UBI.
- mmooss 3mo ago> each citizen has a volition and a voice and a vote Each citizen can't evaluate climate data. Specialization is necessary.
- budsniffer952 3mo agoEach citizen doesn't need to, only some citizens need be able to. Because the data is available. Not sure about you, but I'm glad we moved away from a system where an anointed cadre of people tell us what's what.
- Peaches4Rent 3mo agoNo one will believe said citizen with expertise because they don't a have a degree. Every billionaire backed media circus will ridicule said citizen. Example: Gary Stevenson is an inequality expert with a masters in economics but people keep demanding where are the PhD grads with his opinion, which there are, but it's a statement to distract and discredit
- mmooss 3mo ago> Each citizen doesn't need to, only some citizens need be able to. > I'm glad we moved away from a system where an anointed cadre of people tell us what's what. Those 'some citizens' are the experts. The 'annointed cadre' thing is just undefined, meaningless BS. Do you think that, lacking expertise, you can distinguish real experts from fraud, valid ideas and facts from misinformation? You can't; the people who think they can, those are the suckers - the ones they target to manipulate.