4 ms·
They may have, unfortunately, proved DOGE's point. The new climate.gov probably costs a fraction of the old one.
by xnx 4mo ago
They may have, unfortunately, proved DOGE's point. The new climate.gov probably costs a fraction of the old one.
- hvb2 4mo agoThat's easy to do. No one has expectations of this one. As soon as a government website is down, it's an outrage. I'm sure money could've been saved. But the cost of this site really isn't the hosting, it's the data being gatherd with all the research
- redsocksfan45 4mo ago[dead]
- willmadden 4mo agoI would like to see climate research funded, but it needs to be de-politicized and stop being used to push fear propaganda and sinister policies. They used it to flat out destroy the economies in much of Europe, while somehow China and India were ignored despite being orders of magnitude bigger problems, according to their own narrative. If any of the above were honest, there would have been blanket trade restrictions and sanctions on China and India so quickly it would make your head spin.
- hvb2 4mo agoThe research is supposed to establish the facts that politicians then interpret? I think, especially in the US, there's no shared starting point anymore. Which makes it very hard for people with different opinions to have a conversation. Not funding science can only make that worse
- evan_ 4mo agoSimply hosting the website wasn't costing that much
- iAMkenough 4mo agoThat's the Republican M.O. Strangle funding to a public service, complain that public service isn't performing, use the consequences of their own actions to justify eliminating the public service indefinitely.
- ordersofmag 4mo agoNope. The main cost of the old climate.gov was the salaries of the folks writing the articles and pulling together the resources. They were not getting paid exorbitantly and are quite interested in still getting paid. Source: I am one of those people.