4 ms·
It's kind of funny to be reading this: > I had Claude Code create mine: I told Claude, more or less: I want to archive, Developer ID-sign, notarize, staple, an
by Tiberium 3mo ago
It's kind of funny to be reading this:
> I had Claude Code create mine: I told Claude, more or less: I want to archive, Developer ID-sign, notarize, staple, and install this app to /Applications without ever opening Xcode. Write me a script that does the whole chain and fails loudly if any step breaks.
Even though the text we're reading is Claude talking to us as well :)
Also it was weird to see the mention of "ask your LLM" at almost every stage in the blog post:
> point Claude Code or your LLM coding tool of choice to this blog post, and let it figure it out
> When in doubt, ask your LLM of choice about them and have it help you get set up. It’s the one that’s going to be using Xcode for you anyway.
> The whole point of using the LLM in the first place is to avoid doing things manually that you don’t want to do.
> Again, if in doubt, ask Claude Code or your LLM of choice to create this for you.
> Again, this is why you talk to your LLM, tell it what you want, and have it help build your workflow.
- ryandrake 3mo agoClaude telling us to point Claude to a web site written by Claude so that we can use Claude to create a build environment...
- ericol 3mo agoyo dawg
- frollogaston 3mo agoClaudius Claudianus (aka Claudian)
- natpalmer1776 3mo agoI heard you liked Claude, so I put extra Claude in your Claude so you can do more Claude.
- lossyalgo 3mo agoI suppose it's easier to turn everyone into unwitting tokenmaxxers than it is to raise prices again.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- theParadox42 3mo ago… that Claude can use, because Claude can’t use the XCode gui very efficiently.
- carimura 3mo ago"Claude was the only LLM to survive the LLM Wars."
- throwaway613746 3mo ago[dead]
- saw66 3mo agoI wrote the post myself. But thanks for assuming. :)
- quasarj 3mo agoThe mistakes in the text made me doubt it was AI, but who knows, maybe it's doing that on purpose now
- ImaCake 3mo agoIt seems too concise to be AI. My (conscious) heuristic for AI writing is how much context is squeezed into a sentence. LLMs seem to be pretty bad at the kind of elegant compression of meaning humans can do when they have done a lot of writing practice. If I had to guess, I would say this is the human summarised conversation(s) with a bot.
- saw66 3mo ago1) tell me what they were then, 2) It wasn't AI. It was me
- saw66 3mo agoClaude didn't write this post. I did.
- jkmcf 3mo agoLike we need another reason not to write and publish!
- resonious 3mo ago"This is the part where you think/learn" and "this is the part where you just let the LLM figure it out" is a fine format for advice nowadays I think. I am getting a little tired of every single HN comment being about how the linked article is written by an LLM.
- hansvm 3mo ago> Even though the text we're reading is Claude talking to us as well :) I'm not getting that vibe from this one; I'd bet money on it at least being substantially human edited. What are the tells you're seeing?