> Did you read the article… These are being used for active calls only. I'm the person who posted the article lol. The article lists several cases where the dr

> Did you read the article… These are being used for active calls only. I'm the person who posted the article lol. The article lists several cases where the drones were used to investigate random people – not active calls. They deployed drones to spy on some guy listening to music on his roof, and used drones to follow two "suspicious individuals" who were just driving to a basketball court. Another instance had drones hovering around outside an apartment building's windows while police were apparently inside. The department's drone use policy says that footage should only be recorded when the drone is at the scene to minimize the exposure of people unrelated to the investigation, but the investigators found that the drones are recording constantly, from takeoff to landing, and capturing everyone and their dog in between. > Can you describe how this breaks the 4th? Put me on the Supreme Court and I'd be happy to do that for you. Until then, there are more qualified people to do it and the rest of us will just know it when we see it. :) edit: removed the part where I said u/infecto didn't read the article – it's clear we both read it and came away with different conclusions.