4 ms·
I'm of the deepest conviction AI-generated text should not show up at all. Proving that however can be difficult (obvious LLM tells aside). Requiring evidence o
by jaredcwhite 3mo ago
I'm of the deepest conviction AI-generated text should not show up at all. Proving that however can be difficult (obvious LLM tells aside). Requiring evidence of authentic human authorship is also difficult, though increasingly I lean towards communities where that is a given for any legitimate shares.
- stackghost 3mo ago>increasingly I lean towards communities where that is a given for any legitimate shares. I have a hard time finding these communities
- dawnerd 3mo agoMastodon, but the hard part is discovery for sure.
- ldoughty 3mo agoWhat qualifies as AI generated? If a human writes it then has AI improve/fix it, does that count? How do you tell which is the case? If we don't allow AI help at all, is that perhaps discriminating against those who don't feel comfortable posting with imperfect English? I agree in principle, but am concerned in implementation... I'm not sure we can be fair without high risk of discrimination Edit: typo fix Edit: or am I AI?! And making edits looks more legit.... (To be clear: I'm not, I play by rules)
- fuckaiwriter 3mo ago[flagged]
- minimaxir 3mo agoAI written comments have been more constructive than what you have been commenting thus far in this post.
- fuckaiwriter 3mo ago[dead]
- jaredcwhite 3mo agoThis is starting to veer into "smoking bans in the restaurants is discrimination against smokers." It's not discrimination to ban a practice which has been proven to be harmful. AI slop is harmful to readers, as well as being harmful to produce. Whatever issues one might raise, for instance someone who is not a native English speaker, we can find alternative solutions which are better for the environment and better for human minds.