3 ms·
I hate how companies wants to decide how one can use their freedom of speech. If I wanted to post nude photos of myself on facebook, well, why shouldn't I be al
by oellegaard 14y ago
I hate how companies wants to decide how one can use their freedom of speech. If I wanted to post nude photos of myself on facebook, well, why shouldn't I be allowed it? Maybe they could force them not to be public, but friends only. Then people could unfriend people, if they were offensive.
Same with Apple not allowing nude pictures on their iBook store.
- Irregardless 14y agoTrue, Zuckerberg thinks we should all share everything. Apparently everything doesn't include things that might scare off advertisers.
- sukuriant 14y agoWell, you're using their servers, so it's not really a freedom of speech issue. When you're on their servers, its their rules; and if you don't like those rules they'll politely inform you (when they're policies they can't change) that you can go elsewhere. And when you start providing that sort of adult content, I imagine (in the US at least) different rules begin to go into play. Just to be friends with someone, you'd need to prove you're 18+; because, as you defined it, some friends-only photos could be 18+. Then you've got other issues, like what it makes facebook look like. When it's possible to have pornography on a website, it changes the demographic that's willing to go to that website. It certainly wouldn't be a large percentage of the world, like it is now. Showing pornography also affects the kind of people that are willing to advertise on your site, and so you may lose money that way. Mature images open a biiiig can of worms.