4 ms·
We don't want to make the different subscription offers too complicated, which is why we've stayed away from having people pay per number of tests executed, or
by rlonn 18y ago
We don't want to make the different subscription offers too complicated, which is why we've stayed away from having people pay per number of tests executed, or similar. I agree that people will want to tweak and run several tests, but a 1-day subscription sounds pretty reasonable then, I think, no?
We currently simulate max 5,000 concurrent users on a site and that is something our own servers can handle, so right now we're not using cloud services. We do have support for running the backend on a cloud though - we've been testing it and it works very well. If customers start asking about running larger tests, then we will probably implement a cloud backend mode that will feature a much, much larger traffic-generating capability (but also be more expensive).
- agotterer 18y agoI think a 1 day subscription makes sense. But from your own usage standpoint, theres a significant difference between running 1 or 2 tests and running 100 in a day. 5,000 seems like a good start. I'm looking for bigger :) Good luck!