3 ms·
I don't know but I would imagine there are a lot of inefficiencies in modern languages from an LLM perspective that it could strip out, reduce token costs, impr
by datakan 3mo ago
I don't know but I would imagine there are a lot of inefficiencies in modern languages from an LLM perspective that it could strip out, reduce token costs, improve speed etc.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- SoftTalker 3mo agoSo, assembly?
- goosejuice 3mo agoThat would be less efficient
- pjmlp 3mo agoThere are already plenty of PLDI and SIGPLAN talks on LLM => Assembly, with some guardrails for determinism, instead of having a "classical" language as translation layer.
- goosejuice 3mo agoSorry are we referring to the efficiency of generating programs (i.e. optimizing LLM software development) or the efficiency of the output (i.e. optimizing software through the generation of assembly)?
- pjmlp 3mo agoWe are referring to not having to use 3GL languages as intermediate step for LLMs to generate native code. "Programming Language Design and Implementation in the Era of Machine Learning" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc3cW0nqAQ0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc3cW0nqAQ0
- goosejuice 3mo agoI'm not seeing strong claims here on improved token efficiency for general use cases, but it's absolutely not my area of expertise. Completely understandable why this would be valuable research though. Will be interesting to see how it evolves.