2 ms·
Then they don't need to tax you and you can just give the money to educational institutions. The argument for taxes is either "I don't think it is fair for me t
by roenxi 3mo ago
Then they don't need to tax you and you can just give the money to educational institutions. The argument for taxes is either "I don't think it is fair for me to pay for this alone since others are benefiting" or "this absolutely positively must be a group effort" (eg, the military).
"I want my taxes to..." is a generally a bad start, because the point of taxes is it doesn't matter what an individual taxpayers wants to happen to them. Most taxpayers want the taxes to not be spent the way they will be. That is why they are taxes. If people had an actual choice then in all likelihood they wouldn't pay them.
- Arubis 3mo agoOkay. I want all my nation’s taxes to contribute to a more-educated populace and I’m willing to vote to effect this.
- dqv 3mo ago> "this absolutely positively must be a group effort" (eg, the military). Which, by extension, means education absolutely positively must be a group effort, even if taxpayers can't understand the n-order effects of severing tax money from education. If society needs the military, then it definitely wants soldiers who understand figurative language so that those soldiers don't shoot themselves in the foot. Being able to communicate well, critically think, understand history - these all come from the humanities (although the learner must go beyond the entry level courses to benefit).