4 ms·
hm, just a shorturl. but the readability is as bad as the other one.
by hazelnut 14y ago
hm, just a shorturl. but the readability is as bad as the other one.
- jere 14y agoYup. Something like this might work better: http://is.gd/google_plus_html5 http://is.gd/google_plus_html5 But it still doesn't matter. Just because you can produce a pretty URL using a 3rd party service doesn't mean it's going to be utilized.
- altryne1 14y agohow about http://gplus.to/html5plus http://gplus.to/html5plus