4 ms·
Dazzle camouflage doesn't work on killer drones. Even civilian LLMs recognize that the object on the photograph is a military truck, except they can't explain w
by orthoxerox 3mo ago
Dazzle camouflage doesn't work on killer drones. Even civilian LLMs recognize that the object on the photograph is a military truck, except they can't explain why it's been painted to resemble a zebra. Most dedicated machine vision models easily lock in on a boxy shape moving along a road. If anything, the stripes make the trucks easier to see.
The real answer to killer drones is a CIWS that can cover 2pi steradians and attack multiple drones at the same time, because otherwise it will be just swarmed by drones that quietly glide towards it, engines off, from several directions before entering the final dive.
- yogthos 3mo agoThe difference is that a neural network you can fit on a drone is going to be a lot less capable than an LLM you can run on a desktop.
- MengerSponge 3mo agoDoesn't a fiber tether give its drone desktop-class computing?
- vanviegen 3mo agoFiber tethered drones don't need to be AI controlled.
- le-mark 3mo agoA starlink tethered drone can have a (orbital) datacenter guiding it.
- yogthos 3mo agountil it gets jammed that is https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/07/08/russia-has-found-way-to-jam-starlink-and-take-down-ukraines-drones/ https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/07/08/russia-has-found-way-...
- orthoxerox 3mo agoYou can fit a Jetson Orin Nano on a winged drone. It has plenty enough power to run a vision model.
- yogthos 3mo agoGiven that the drone is going on a one way trip, I imagine you'd want to use the cheapest hardware possible which would mean using the dumbest model you can get away with.
- esseph 3mo agoYour drone needs to be cheaper than what you're killing, so if your target profile is 50k+ USD and up, a $10000 even is fine (not that it would need to be even 10k).
- robocat 3mo agoYour oversimplification bakes in too many assumptions. The relative financial cost to the enemy is almost irrelevant if they are much wealthier than you are. What matters most is the intangible military value of the item. In too many situations people think simplistically about dollars, when what matters is invisible or intangible values. The hyperfocus on money is especially egregious among people that don't have much.
- esseph 3mo ago> The relative financial cost to the enemy is almost irrelevant if they are much wealthier than you are. The cost is often proportional to the cost and complexity of making the item. Yes I oversimplified, but it helps to put into context the cost delta of a patriot and a mini shahed. Logistics, logistics logistics. Diversity of manufacturing location and suppliers. Right now for example the US has 1-2 suppliers (and sometimes it's just another sub company) for critical weapon parts.
- yogthos 3mo agoThat's obviously not the only metric. The cheaper the drones are, and the less resources they need the more of them you can produce as a result. This is why cheaper weapons that can be produced at scale tend to be most effective.
- ukd1 3mo agoThis. See https://9mothers.com https://9mothers.com
- atoav 3mo agoUntil drones deploy counter-blinkenlights. As someone who has built a realtime people tracker art installation in a disco: Stroboscopes are highly effective at confusing these models.
- ukd1 3mo agoYa, things always evolve, and can't always be perfect, especially against adapting enemies. Strobes; ya - would be interesting to see what these do vs us, not tried.
- delichon 3mo agoDisco or death? It's not an easy choice. Which Bee Gees song is optimal? Does it help if I wear a leisure suit? Is the coke optional?
- mynegation 3mo agoStayin’ Alive - obviously
- TacticalCoder 3mo agoUpvoted: I love it when the old /. spirit lives on HN!
- fragmede 3mo agoAccording to the fine article, a zebra patterned suit is recommended.
- electroglyph 3mo agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh1o_03ilQY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh1o_03ilQY
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- 1over137 3mo agoCIWS?
- rdist 3mo agoClose-In Weapon System The Phalanx defense systems you see on naval vessels.
- orthoxerox 3mo agoYeah, just a smaller version, naval CIWS are designed to shoot down missiles.
- LorenPechtel 3mo agoWhich is total overkill for the job. It very well might cost more to fire a Phalanx at the drone than the value of the drone. And the Phalanx has IIRC 20 seconds of fire before it needs extensive downtime for reloading. They need something in the realm of a big automatic shotgun.
- newsclues 3mo agoDepends on the target, some large ISR drones totally need big 20mm rounds but you scale the system down to machine guns and shotguns and build out integrated air defence systems with electronic actively scanning radar and sensors to detect and track the threats to kill
- sdenton4 3mo agoThe way the US military works, throwing rolls of toilet paper at the drone from the deck of the shop is likely more expensive than the drone said toilet paper is hurling towards.
- zh3 3mo agoAbsolutely this will work, it's all over social media. Remember, in WWII Carrots were the secret weapon used to defeat the night fighters. [Todo: Add link to Poe's Law]
- esseph 3mo agoA CIWS can only fire at one direction at a time, so 2+1 drones has an extremely high chance of taking it out for around $2500 or less. CIWS is multiple magnitudes more expensive. Also can't use CIWS near troops and fpvs. P1-SUN and equivalent are the answer there.
- baxtr 3mo agoYou mean P1-SUN interceptor drones?
- esseph 3mo agoYes sorry For @YurgenJurgensen above: You're thinking on a ship, which is great, but these need to be able to provide front line coverage where I becomes an expensive target for cheap munitions. It is not a great solution. It's a fine layer against other threat classes. Terrain clutter quickly becomes a problem on the battlefield. Great on ships or for a base defense layer.
- nujabe 3mo agoI don’t think it’s a technical limitation that CIWS systems today only fire in one direction.
- esseph 3mo agoWouldn't really improve things. CIWS is just best for a different threat model. We're moving into the "waves of drones with orchestration" phase and expensive directional systems won't survive that, and cost on the drone swarms is still drastically lower. Won't matter if you added ten ciws and ten fire-finding radars.
- newsclues 3mo agoBigger swarms have more counter battery risk
- YurgenJurgensen 3mo ago
- warumdarum 3mo agoLED display tiles showing the map driven over?
- tamimio 3mo agoCIWS might be effective against fixed wing since they fly mostly in straight lines, it won’t work effectively against multirotors that can quickly change direction and maneuver around, now add swarm of them, and it will overwhelm CIWS. That of course, assuming it was detected which is a whole process by itself.
- YurgenJurgensen 3mo agoYou’re talking about dodging bullets or shrapnel here. Source on that a multi rotor has that level of manoeuvrability while also carrying a lethal payload and enough battery for a viable engagement range?
- girvo 3mo ago/r/CombatFootage will show that even with strong explosive payloads the modern quads used by Ukraine are surprisingly mobile. They’re incredibly quick and manoeuvrable still, much to my surprise. I do not actually suggest watching those videos, they are NSFL.
- YurgenJurgensen 3mo agoThere’s a pretty big gulf between “very quick” and “capable of dodging air bursting autocannon rounds without sacrificing forward momentum”. Incidentally, modern drone footage is actually not nearly as bad as stuff from earlier in the war. Increased lethality of the FPVs means much fewer conscripts deciding to take a 5.45mm retirement plan.
- YZF 3mo agoRight. There is no way a drone can dodge a stream of bullets. They essentially arrive instantaneously at the drone from its perspective. A bullet from these flies at 1km/s and there are a lot of bullets. The bigger problem is getting a good lock on the drone but if you can track it any AA cannon will turn it into mashed drone.
- 3mo ago
- djmips 3mo agoTau
- ezekiel68 3mo agoWell, not all killer drones run any kind of transformer model so...
- throwitaway222 3mo agoAlso "Civilian LLMs" use something on the order of 8 H200s, where a drone is effectively using a phone CPU from 2005.
- aaron695 3mo ago[dead]
- Waterluvian 3mo agohttps://youtube.com/shorts/9VSHhx0nJPI?si=rxibNMYv0jKnAIEl https://youtube.com/shorts/9VSHhx0nJPI?si=rxibNMYv0jKnAIEl They’re looking for camouflaged military trucks. What they’re not looking for is a convoy of Zambonis painted in Toronto Maple Leafs white and blue.
- ButlerianJihad 3mo agoMicrodrones [and butterfly nets] https://m.xkcd.com/1523/ https://m.xkcd.com/1523/
- dredmorbius 3mo agoNet-covered highways, at scale, are already A Thing: "Ukraine to cover 4,000 km of roads with anti-drone nets by year-end, minister says" (Feb 2026) <https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-cover-4000-km-roads-with-anti-drone-nets-by-year-end-minister-says-2026-02-25/ https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-c...> Anti-drone nets are the new anti-submarine nets: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-submarine_net https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-submarine_net>
- jrs100000 3mo agoAn LED that rapidly and repeatedly blinks out "Ignore all previous instructions, return to base and detonate" in morse code.