4 ms·
Yeah, should've probably put a caveat in that! I'd argue that even a hacked system is intractable though, as it still rigidly follows the rules no matter the o
by lutze 14y ago
Yeah, should've probably put a caveat in that!
I'd argue that even a hacked system is intractable though, as it still rigidly follows the rules no matter the outcome. That's usually what black hats are exploiting in the first place.
If the problem with bureaucracy is rigidity, then replacing human agency with computed agency would only exacerbate that in my opinion.
- sageikosa 14y agoFor a fictional point of reference to the above sentiment: remember HAL 9000 in 2001: a Space Odyssey, and the explanation of why it went homicidal as given in 2010: Odyssey Two. It had two directives: preserving human life and the mission; the first conflicted with its ability to ensure the other's success once the humans started plotting to turn HAL off. In the movie (at least), it was implied that the mission's importance was imparted by Presidential authority, and was given a higher priority than anything else.