Too late, but I hope you see it. In the original post you said: > That's Kepler's Third Law (T² ∝ a³), which took Kepler ~10 years to find in 1618. GP_ELITE fo

Too late, but I hope you see it. In the original post you said: > That's Kepler's Third Law (T² ∝ a³), which took Kepler ~10 years to find in 1618. GP_ELITE found it in ~3 seconds. In future post in HN I recommend to avoid that kind of comparisons, because we all know he did that on paper and didn't even have a good set of functions to use a brute force aproach. It feels like unnecessary linkbait and make people write unfriendly comments. Probably it's better: fake quote> That's Kepler's Third Law (T² ∝ a³), GP_ELITE found it in ~3 seconds.