15 ms·
This strikes me as NIMBYism at a global scale. At least you've got yours right!
by freedomben 3mo ago
This strikes me as NIMBYism at a global scale. At least you've got yours right!
- rr808 3mo agoIts more the other way around. Its mostly used by the wealthiest few percent, the majority of the world has to pay for the damage it causes.
- lern_too_spel 3mo agoAs long as the externalities are paid for, I don't see the problem. Musk has made the world a worse place in many ways, but I don't see how this is one of them.
- rr808 3mo agothis thread is about satellites cluttering the night sky. Is SpaceX paying for this? Not the mention the CO2 emissions of all the rockets.
- lern_too_spel 3mo agoYou're right. Private launches are undertaxed. Launch cost used to be so prohibitive that it didn't matter, but regulation hasn't kept up.
- sucrosesucrose 3mo agoI price the externalities at infinite price. They cannot be paid.
- lern_too_spel 3mo agoYou're saying if someone offered you a billion dollars to launch a satellite no different from most other satellites already in space, you would say, "No, thank you, madam!" I'm skeptical, but if you insist, I'll take you at your word.