4 ms·
> Separate question, separate table. This is our standard latency harness (three short prompts, five reps, 400-token cap), not the build tasks. tok/s is output
by paxys 4mo ago
> Separate question, separate table. This is our standard latency harness (three short prompts, five reps, 400-token cap), not the build tasks. tok/s is output tokens over wall-clock, uniform for all.
> so their tok/s is a ceiling, not a true decode rate. The clear read: the GPT-5.6 tiers are the snappiest models here on short prompts (Luna answers in about a second), Qwen is absurdly cheap and fast, and DeepSeek and GLM are the slowpokes
You put in a lot of good work, and kudos for that, but man, reading paragraphs like these just puts me off of the entire piece.
Like…how hard would it have been really to type these two sentences by hand, in your own natural voice?
- jakubmazanec 4mo ago> how hard would it have been really to type these two sentences by hand, in your own natural voice On the other hand, do we have to complain about every seemingly AI written text?
- fluidcruft 4mo agoIt is just horrible writing style. It doesn't particularly matter that AI wrote it.
- jakubmazanec 4mo agoDon't read it then. Why waste enrgy on complaining?
- fluidcruft 4mo agoFor the same reasons you replied to my comment
- paxys 4mo agoYes? AI generated text is explicitly disallowed on HN, so it’s not crazy to expect that a similar standard be used for linked content.
- kbelder 4mo agoBut AI generated linked content was explicitly not disallowed. At least not at this time.
- fluidcruft 4mo agoYeah, I can't figure out where this "voice" comes from and it is so impossible to get rid of. It is so grating.
- Chu4eeno 4mo agoThe problem is that everyone (well, too many) is now using the same "voice" when writing. So no matter how good or thoughtful the writing is it gets tiresome.
- furyofantares 4mo agoThat's not true at all, human tends to come through (in a way I didn't notice pre-LLM) with varied tone, with opinions injected, and with varying degrees of weight to different components, in all but the most egregious of examples (linkedin motivation pieces, apple marketing speak). LLMs have a bunch of tricks for dressing up their infodumps, but they are almost purely infodumps, and no real opinion comes through. There's no sense of more importance to one statement or the other, it's all monotone (and usually over the top.)
- jaggederest 4mo agoYou can suggest a different one and it works pretty well, the bar is very low. I asked for hemingway in a planning document one time and the result was highly amusing to everyone. "We will not wreck it with small greeds." was an all time favorite for me.
- zeven7 4mo agoMan invents text generation machine. Man generates text.
- sublinear 4mo agoIt's the unholy trinity of pundits, marketing, and HR. Their writing was already painted into this corner long before the LLM epoch and they continue to publish more than anyone else.
- razighter777 4mo agoIt's so telling and offputting. Please write like a normal human and put the effort in to type what you want to say. Using AI to make your writing is not only lazy, it's bland, tiresome, and disrespectful of the reader's time.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- stickfigure 4mo agoEh? I write that way sometimes. Long before LLMs. I'm sick and tired of reading comments like these.
- TrackerFF 4mo agoFor the arguments sake: What if that is the authors natural voice?
- fatata123 4mo ago[dead]
- scotty79 4mo agoPeople became such a fragile snowflakes since AI popped up. Fussy because a programmer didn't produce prose they fancy.