5 ms·

Holy shit. I thought the bullet splashes were CGI. I'm even more impressed that they were real practical effects, that is indeed nextfuckinglevel

jonhohle 3mo ago
Believe it or not, there is 6 minutes of onscreen CGI in T2 and only 6 minutes of onscreen CGI in Jurassic Park. The 80s and 90s were magical with practical effects. So many things were difficult to imagine how they were pulled off. In the last 20 years, everything’s just CGI. Movies like Mad Max: Fury Road and Fall Guy are few and far between.
- bensyverson 3mo ago
  My friend, there are over 2000 VFX shots in Fury Road, and at least 600 in The Fall Guy. I get that people are tired of CGI, but it’s a tool that is used in virtually every film that reaches theaters, for reasons as prosaic as matching skies between shots.
  - Joel_Mckay 3mo ago
    These days it is mostly just Directors, Producers, and Investors that don't respect the medium. They just see a film as more Brand management issues. It has little to do with "how the hotdogs are made". Most good CGI isn't noticeable. Yet everyone is there to make a story look great, even when faced with a re-heated dog-turd of a script. =3
  - croes 3mo ago
    The question is for what is the tool used. To mach colors and hide cables or the complete content of a scene
    - CyberDildonics 3mo ago
      I don't know where you are getting that idea. The entire movie is soaked with cg from every angle. https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual-effects-of-mad-max-fury-road/ https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual...
      - croes 3mo ago
        And now compare to an Marvel or Transformers movie where many shots don't have a single real thing in it
        CyberDildonics 3mo ago
        What the person up to said: In the last 20 years, everything’s just CGI. Movies like Mad Max: Fury Road and Fall Guy are few and far between. There is no world where naming a random longer movie with more effects makes mad max an example of a movie that doesn't use cgi. Something completely unrelated doesn't make a false statement true. There was some marketing that got people to believe this and it's an outright lie.
        defrost 3mo ago
        Miller repeatedly stressed that the MM: Fury Road stunts were real and the physics was real world - that got turned into a false "quote" about less than 10% CGI .. and that became mythical when the MM: Furiosa trailer had obvious in your face digitally artificial characters, etc. Of interest, perhaps: * The 'Fury Road' Practical Effects Myth Is Hurting 'Furiosa' - https://textualvariations.substack.com/p/fury-fx-furiosa https://textualvariations.substack.com/p/fury-fx-furiosa [ * The visual effects of Mad Max: Fury Road - https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual-effects-of-mad-max-fury-road/ https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual... ] ( oops, my bad, I put the second link in not realising you had already referenced that up thread ) The distinction, for now I guess, would be "movies with real actors really moving on real props" versus "movies that are damn near fully generated including much of the actors (eg: lead actor speaks and provided body capture, doesn't actually appear "raw" at any point).
- CyberDildonics 3mo ago
  Mad Max: Fury Road Mad Max: Fury Road is wall to wall CG, compositing and everything in between. https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual-effects-of-mad-max-fury-road/ https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual...

jonhohle 3mo ago

Believe it or not, there is 6 minutes of onscreen CGI in T2 and only 6 minutes of onscreen CGI in Jurassic Park. The 80s and 90s were magical with practical effects. So many things were difficult to imagine how they were pulled off. In the last 20 years, everything’s just CGI. Movies like Mad Max: Fury Road and Fall Guy are few and far between.

bensyverson 3mo ago
My friend, there are over 2000 VFX shots in Fury Road, and at least 600 in The Fall Guy. I get that people are tired of CGI, but it’s a tool that is used in virtually every film that reaches theaters, for reasons as prosaic as matching skies between shots.
- Joel_Mckay 3mo ago
  These days it is mostly just Directors, Producers, and Investors that don't respect the medium. They just see a film as more Brand management issues. It has little to do with "how the hotdogs are made". Most good CGI isn't noticeable. Yet everyone is there to make a story look great, even when faced with a re-heated dog-turd of a script. =3
- croes 3mo ago
  The question is for what is the tool used. To mach colors and hide cables or the complete content of a scene
  - CyberDildonics 3mo ago
    I don't know where you are getting that idea. The entire movie is soaked with cg from every angle. https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual-effects-of-mad-max-fury-road/ https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual...
    - croes 3mo ago
      And now compare to an Marvel or Transformers movie where many shots don't have a single real thing in it
      - CyberDildonics 3mo ago
        What the person up to said: In the last 20 years, everything’s just CGI. Movies like Mad Max: Fury Road and Fall Guy are few and far between. There is no world where naming a random longer movie with more effects makes mad max an example of a movie that doesn't use cgi. Something completely unrelated doesn't make a false statement true. There was some marketing that got people to believe this and it's an outright lie.
        defrost 3mo ago
        Miller repeatedly stressed that the MM: Fury Road stunts were real and the physics was real world - that got turned into a false "quote" about less than 10% CGI .. and that became mythical when the MM: Furiosa trailer had obvious in your face digitally artificial characters, etc. Of interest, perhaps: * The 'Fury Road' Practical Effects Myth Is Hurting 'Furiosa' - https://textualvariations.substack.com/p/fury-fx-furiosa https://textualvariations.substack.com/p/fury-fx-furiosa [ * The visual effects of Mad Max: Fury Road - https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual-effects-of-mad-max-fury-road/ https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual... ] ( oops, my bad, I put the second link in not realising you had already referenced that up thread ) The distinction, for now I guess, would be "movies with real actors really moving on real props" versus "movies that are damn near fully generated including much of the actors (eg: lead actor speaks and provided body capture, doesn't actually appear "raw" at any point).
CyberDildonics 3mo ago
Mad Max: Fury Road Mad Max: Fury Road is wall to wall CG, compositing and everything in between. https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual-effects-of-mad-max-fury-road/ https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/a-graphic-tale-the-visual...