3 ms·
They wouldn't. It would be a waste of their time. What sneak is referring to are the producers, distributors, and retailers that will eventually make up this s
by leehuffman 14y ago
They wouldn't. It would be a waste of their time.
What sneak is referring to are the producers, distributors, and retailers that will eventually make up this system. The federal government would have interest in those dealing with large quantities.
The problem is that everyone is freaking out before anything is put in place. If the federal government plans to do any of this, they're going to let the state know, and we'll just have to see how it plays out from there.
- wilfra 14y agoThat's actually not what he was referring to. I'd be interested to see him post one example, though, of the federal government making any enforcement on users for any reason at any time. You want to ignore that? And still claim it might happen? This gets decided by the DOJ, which is controlled by President Obama, whose base is college students and...others who show a propensity toward lighting up. Cracking down on everyday pot smokers would be political suicide.
- glesica 14y agoObama has run his final campaign. Sure, he's going to worry about his legacy now, but there's no such thing as "political suicide" for him any more. Just sayin'.
- mattmanser 14y agoThere is for his party though.