3 ms·
> The standard answer is greed: rapacious ambulance operators, owned by villainous private equity firms, exploit patients at their most helpless. But I don’t th
by chmod775 3mo ago
> The standard answer is greed: rapacious ambulance operators, owned by villainous private equity firms, exploit patients at their most helpless. But I don’t think that’s actually what’s going on. Ambulance providers are chronically unprofitable businesses; margins are thin, crews are underpaid, and operators exit the industry every year.
The author does not understand how private equity extracts money. The high-liability and heavily scrutinized business is intentionally left with little profit: the actual profits are funneled up the supply chain. This is why private equity buys "nonprofit" hospitals - they can now control who that nonprofit buys services and equipment from.
- IG_Semmelweiss 3mo ago[flagged]
- chmod775 3mo agoLet's ask the thing whose mistakes I iron out all day to think for me.
- hnmullany 3mo agoI worked in private equity as an analyst in the 90's - we looked at an ambulance service that was up for sale - the underlying operating margins (before you load on debt) were pretty reasonable, although I don't remember the details.
- veunes 3mo agoThin operating margins don't really settle the greed question when the ownership structure is complicated
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]