4 ms·
I am not arguing for a middle ground, I argue for addressing the issues directly instead of being maximalist in any way.
by mrtksn 3mo ago
I am not arguing for a middle ground, I argue for addressing the issues directly instead of being maximalist in any way.
- JoshTriplett 3mo agoYou are dismissing things as "maximalist", which is not conducive to treating certain things as sacrosanct. For example: end-to-end encryption is sacrosanct, and must not be broken, ever. If you want access, your only option should be to serve one of the ends a warrant. That's not "maximalist", that's holding to a principle.