4 ms·
Certainly puts me off. $5/10 per user per year, wouldn't think twice about it (even though the money would be paid grudgingly). With the number of users we have
by Margh 14y ago
Certainly puts me off. $5/10 per user per year, wouldn't think twice about it (even though the money would be paid grudgingly). With the number of users we have that would end up being around $50/year; but $500/year to host some email and store spreadsheets? No thanks.
- chrisblackwell 14y agoLet's imagine your company has 100 employees in it. So at $5/user a month, you are paying $500 a month. Now, the median salary for thos 100 employees is most likely at least $3000, so you are paying them collectively $300,000 a month. That represents 0.016% of their salary. Do you get where I'm going with this?
- Margh 14y agoAnd when the median salary of your employees is $0/month (prototyping or a family domain or something) and your options are: a. Nothing b. $50/(employee/family member) What then? Of course no company paying $300,000/month is going to care about $50/user/year. Edit: Clarification
- acchow 14y agoYou're off by an order of magnitude. There's also a shorter way to compute percentages since (5x100)/(3000x100) = 5/3000 5/3000 = 0.16%.