3 ms·
This article seems to make good points about how useless and invasive Chat Control 1.0 is, but then posits Chat Control 2.0 as the answer. Is the latter not als
by largbae 3mo ago
This article seems to make good points about how useless and invasive Chat Control 1.0 is, but then posits Chat Control 2.0 as the answer. Is the latter not also terrible for privacy, demanding backdoors in all encrypted chat tech?
- londons_explore 3mo agoThe proponents argue that those backdoors are a good thing because then the government can keep you safe from people saying nasty things.
- bigyabai 3mo agoYou're asking a community that couldn't decide if Client Side Scanning was safe and private at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28068741 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28068741 Surveillance is a branding issue. If you wrap a shit in crepe paper and Corinthian leather, most people will admire what an artist you are.