4 ms·
So sad to see that no articles about this even mention Mercurial. This is a golden opportunity for Hg providers to shine.
by BrenBarn 3mo ago
So sad to see that no articles about this even mention Mercurial. This is a golden opportunity for Hg providers to shine.
- signa11 3mo agothis not a `git` failure per se...
- BrenBarn 3mo agoYes, but the thing is just that if people are looking around for new providers it's an opportunity for alternative systems to attract attention and users.
- navigate8310 3mo agoI understand what you convey, however, users are tired of the git GUI, not git itself.
- signa11 3mo agobecause github is subpar, you will try to convince people to migrate their repositories to $NOT_GIT so they can try a different hosting service ? doesn’t sound like a pragmatic choice to me.
- srean 3mo agoI miss Bitbucket's Mercurial offering.
- DonHopkins 3mo agoBut Github is already fully volatile, capricious, fickle, erratic, unpredictable, variable, inconsistent, changeable, unstable, whimsical, protean, fluid, and a polluting poisonous room temperature liquid heavy metal, so why would you also need mercurial?
- srean 3mo ago:) Was very happy to find that Hginit.com has been given a new life here https://hginit.github.io/ https://hginit.github.io/
- kps 3mo agoI never liked git and held on the Mercurial until a couple years ago. Now, for all I do, jj is a better Mercurial than Mercurial.