3 ms·
Thank you. I too am interested in the technical aspects, not how many guardrails it can hit against Fable, like, who cares? As long as it can get me (more) unce
by satvikpendem 3mo ago
Thank you. I too am interested in the technical aspects, not how many guardrails it can hit against Fable, like, who cares? As long as it can get me (more) uncensored access without killing itself over biology or chemistry, it's a good model to me.
I can't believe the top comment is about some political reply garbage, as if that actually matters day to day for coders; in reality I want to get my work done.
- spiderfarmer 3mo ago[flagged]
- gadders 3mo agoThey must be incredibly proud of you for inventing nazis in your imagination and then fighting them. Stunning and brave.
- spiderfarmer 3mo agoElon's posse: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/neo-fascist-patriot-front-washington-dc https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/neo-fascist-...
- gadders 3mo agoBased on what evidence?
- pjerem 3mo agoI'll take the downvotes with you, but I feel that you have to know that you are not alone thinking like this.
- s1artibartfast 3mo agoWhat Noble sacrifice
- pjerem 3mo agoI'm not doing a sacrifice. I just think it's important for people to know they are not alone thinking the current situation is abnormal. If you are snarking about the "karma" part, it's strange that I have to clarify but that's just a formula, I can't care less about my karma on a website.
- spiderfarmer 3mo agoThanks. In my experience people who idolize billionaires, especially those that think empathy is weakness, have questionable judgement and lack a moral compass. So of course they’ll try to ridicule people like you and me. Especially on a forum started by billionaires looking for the next billionaires, frequented by people who would stop at nothing to become a billionaire. Don’t give up on pointing this character flaw out everywhere you see it, as our children come across threads like these on a daily basis. And they need to see the bootlickers for what they are.
- s1artibartfast 3mo agoIt is a formula for advertising sacrifice and victimhood.
- Pay08 3mo ago[flagged]
- pjerem 3mo ago[flagged]
- cauch 3mo agoIt feels like you are doing exactly what you criticize by putting "Nazi" as some sort of Disney villains. The reality is that the majority of the Nazi, the real ones, the ones who made the Nazi atrocities possible, where just humans like you and me, and they were "just" supporting the party because they've eaten the propaganda. Some people that are called "Nazi" today are often __way more Nazi__ than these average Nazi citizen. I would say the opposite as you: people like you put "Nazi" as the secular Satan, and because of that, real dangerous behavior can be ignored, the same real dangerous behavior that led, step by step, to the real Nazi atrocities.
- Pay08 3mo ago> Some people that are called "Nazi" today are often __way more Nazi__ than these average Nazi citizen. No, they aren't. This is the exact thing I was talking about but you can't seem to divorce your thinking from preestablished patterns. The Holocaust wasn't some universal evil. It was a genocide of Jews. The greatest incarnation of antisemitism seen in history. It wasn't a crime against the entirety of humanity. It was a crime against Jews that got appropriated. Antisemitism is the core of nazism, but since Jewish lives are cheap, no one gives a shit about that part, or about how post-war antisemitism in Austria and Germany gave rise to Hitler and the NSDAP. They haven't "eaten" the propaganda, they lived it before the nazis ever existed. Hell, Simon Wiesenthal was forced to invent 5 million non-Jewish victims of the Holocaust simply so people would give a shit about the whole thing (I'm not even going to mention that the whole "banality of evil" thing was based on false testimony.) And when people are actual neonazis, they get excused. If you're familiar with American politics, you can see Platner as the most recent example. > The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable’. - George Orwell, Politics and the English Language (1946)
- egeozcan 3mo agoHey there, you're not alone. I think it matters to make the support explicit when it comes to this matter. I'm fully open to reopening the books and discussing why we made these things unacceptable. I'm of the "let the world burn if that's the cost of free speech" kind. But you can't get on a stage and do that salute, say racist things, push Nazi propaganda, and expect people to accept any association with your name on it. That's not speaking your mind on my book, that's a call to action, especially when you are doing it literally on a stage. A line on the sand this may be, but it's my line, and I'm glad to see there are others.
- sydney6 3mo ago[flagged]
- mlrtime 3mo ago[dead]
- 21asdffdsa12 3mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- satvikpendem 3mo agoLiteral case in point as the only reply to me is a now flagged comment again about political garbage.