3 ms·
Don't know if you are serious, but why become part of the problem? Why not just review a single document quickly, find an error which invalidates the document,
by nswango 3mo ago
Don't know if you are serious, but why become part of the problem?
Why not just review a single document quickly, find an error which invalidates the document, and send it back saying "Policy paper 1 mentions X as being on the business plan for Y, it's not on the plan, please can you fix."
- reed1234 3mo agoWhy do your colleagues work when they could at least attempt it first?
- zufallsheld 3mo agoBecause they'll just paste your remarks in their llm, let it correct the text and send it back to you.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- lesostep 3mo agoBecause they will fix it and send again. Unless you can write a good-sounding reason why it's on them to review a LLM output before sending it to you, they will outsources this reviewing to you, and it's a lot of reviewing.
- nswango 3mo agoIt's not a lot of reviewing if you simply find the first thing that makes the document unusable and call them out on it. If it's genuinely hard to find that single bug .. perhaps the document has reached the quality required for corporate communication?
- lesostep 3mo agoOriginal comment stated that it was 10 documents, all LLM-generated. In my experience, it does take a lot time and effort to find contradictions between 10 documents. Even with good documentation, it's hard to build a mental map for that amount of information.