4 ms·
I didn't mean to call you lazy, I hadn't seen any evidence that you see Beijing and Moscow as undifferentiated other, which is the habit of thought I did call l
by reinitctxoffset 3mo ago
I didn't mean to call you lazy, I hadn't seen any evidence that you see Beijing and Moscow as undifferentiated other, which is the habit of thought I did call lazy.
You are awfully contrarian for someone whose response to an argument is "that's not proven to my satisfaction" and when asked what citations would satisfy you replies "it's not my job to define what citations I will and won't admit".
You do you king, but it's not exactly the incandescent childlike wonder of the perpetual student's mind.
I'll wager your mind was made up before we started having a conversation.
- mmooss 3mo ago> when asked what citations would satisfy you replies "it's not my job to define what citations I will and won't admit". That exchange never happened - maybe you're thinking of someone else? > I'll wager your mind was made up You can see how empty the Sinophile side is: they will talk about anything, say anything, but provide actual substance as a basis for their claims.
- nixon_why69 3mo agoHaving a side is a habit of the uncurious.
- mmooss 3mo agoI agree, and there's clearly a Sinophile side here: I wish people would engage in a substantive discussion instead of attacking others, this time as 'uncurious'. As I've pointed out, anything but engage on substance.