4 ms·

I will put a contrarian point of view (just for the sake of discussion): The law is good because Google can afford to pay and the hordes of blogspammers can't.

by Shorel 14y ago

I will put a contrarian point of view (just for the sake of discussion): The law is good because Google can afford to pay and the hordes of blogspammers can't. Therefore Germany will be the first country without blogspam.

derleth 14y ago
> blogspam You have a weird definition of 'blogspam' if using a headline to point to an article you're commenting on qualifies as 'blogspam'. There's nothing in the law (from what I've seen) that says "If you have more than a paragraph of text, this doesn't apply to you" or anything similar to that.