29 ms·
Fewer people aren't staring into their phones or talking to them -- makes your social antennas pick up automatically on not wanting to disturb them (lest you dr
by hackrmn 3mo ago
Fewer people aren't staring into their phones or talking to them -- makes your social antennas pick up automatically on not wanting to disturb them (lest you draw their ire for not having the social antennas long enough to pick up on the fact they're "busy and don't want to engage with you" like a gymrat with AirPods to signal they're there to pump in peace and quiet listening to their favourite playlist, not talk to strangers). Happened to me already many times just with people scrolling their phone instead of talking and not wanting to talk in particular either, not to me at least. And no -- I am not talking about bothering strangers in the gym etc, I am talking about sitting at the lunch table where half of the people look into their phones -- they aren't actually interested in talking, it turns out.
Our devices have now increased the distance _between_ us -- it's not about _you_ being able to "do X" -- talking to others is not _you_ doing it, it's you _and the other person_ doing it _together_. You can't be doing anything together consentually when the other person is in the habit of talking with their AI, or doomscrolling for that matter.
- andai 3mo agoThere are still lots of social people. I found a lot of people actually do want to talk but are just shy. I spent a few weeks at a hostel last year. It was always kind of depressing and tense in the shared kitchen, just this heavy silence. I don't feel comfortable around strangers, so I solved that problem by just saying hi to everyone. Most people didn't respond much, although most of them smiled and the tension was eased. But a few of them struck up conversation and we ended up making friends. I ended up making like, ten new friends in two weeks. And then a bunch of them ended up becoming friends with each other as well.
- domga 3mo agoThis is an individual solution to a systemic problem. On a personal level, it is possible to solve such problems, but generally no, the ship has sailed quite some time ago (I personally think cars are to blame). Even if you do it, you are still swimming against the current.
- logicchains 3mo ago>This is an individual solution to a systemic problem. On a personal level, it is possible to solve such problems I.e. it's only a problem if you're not willing to go and strike up conversations with people. Which is not AI or mobile phones' fault. Expecting society to come up with "systemic situations" to your personal problems is a fast path to a lifetime of disappointment.
- Kbelicius 3mo ago> it's only a problem if you're not willing to go and strike up conversations with people. It is not a problem if there are other people willing to also go and strike up conversations with people. That is why GP wrote that it is a systemic problem that can be solved on a personal level. > Expecting society to come up with "systemic situations" to your personal problems is a fast path to a lifetime of disappointment. It is not a personal problem. It is a systemic problem. Are you conflating on purpose or do you not understand the difference? And it is a systemic problem, all you need to do is look at the data.
- batperson 3mo agoSocial people will be fine, I think this tech is far more important for lonely people who for any reason don't get to socialize much (if at all), this is especially common in older people. These people might not have any other alternatives.
- anon-3988 3mo ago> I think this tech is far more important for lonely people who for any reason don't get to socialize much (if at all), this is especially common in older people. Uhm, those lonely people need to get out and start talking. How is this going to help society? This is going to make it worse. Oh that kid is kinda quite and sad? Throw him an iPad. Oh that adult is kinda bored and wandering aimlessly? Throw him into a casino. Oh that adult is kinda lonely and feels like they don't have anyone they can talk to about their life? Give them LLM companionship. Yep, it is over for humanity. People simply don't understand externalities.
- jamilton 3mo ago>Uhm, those lonely people need to get out and start talking. Great, what is being done to help that happen?
- anon-3988 3mo agoUnironically just "man up". I get that there are some people that have actual sickness that prevents them from socializing but your little anxiety does not count. Believe me, I know I have the same problem. I quite literally had no friends for almost 7 years or after highschool. Society can't afford to babysit a 30 years old man that have anxiety and doesn't want to put any effort. My parent had to call me to check if I am alive, and even then, I don't feel like talking to them after months of no talking. I had zero interest to form any kind of relationship. That feeling that you have when you are feeling like "I would rather just order Uber", yea, you need to OVERCOME that. That is the effort. Ruminating, thinking and fantasizing about what "could have been" does not count. Even if all I am saying is bullshit, "what is being done to help"? What about what is being done to make it way, way, way, way, way worse. If I had LLM companionship when I was alone, yea, I would have never gotten out of my shell. I would be stuck in there forever. Hell, why should I even talk to you? I should just argue with a robot instead.