3 ms·
Not true since a few months, genuinely try GLM 5.2 and Minimax M3, especially in adversarial/gating... as a general model, I can agree, but as a coding model, t
by pixel_popping 3mo ago
Not true since a few months, genuinely try GLM 5.2 and Minimax M3, especially in adversarial/gating... as a general model, I can agree, but as a coding model, they are not bad, comparable to maybe Opus 4.5 in real usage which is quite impressive.
- llmslave 3mo agoyeah but why waste your time on these models, just use the one that gets the better results
- somenameforme 3mo agoI was going to respond until I saw your account name lol.
- llmslave 3mo agohaha i outsource my thinking to the smartest model
- 9183726518 3mo agoBecause you can get them from more trustworthy providers or with hardware encryption.
- llmslave 3mo agoi trust anthropic/openai with my data far more than some random startup.
- nicoburns 3mo agoI actively prefer GLM-5.2 for some tasks. For simple tasks the results are just as good as e.g. Opus, and it produces results significantly faster.
- villish 3mo agoI use GLM or DS4 to help me draft a better initial prompt with more information that I then give to Sonnet 5/Fable/GPT5.5. While benchmarks show the open models close to frontier level, my experience with them is drastically different. I have high confidence that Fable or GPT will 1 shot solutions. At least with low level programming languages. They're all very good for webdev stuff.