2 ms·
> #1 is a net-better outcome for everyone else than doing nothing. You kill some corrupt guy, just to replace him with another corrupt guy who's in the leader'
by palmotea 4mo ago
> #1 is a net-better outcome for everyone else than doing nothing.
You kill some corrupt guy, just to replace him with another corrupt guy who's in the leader's good-graces. How is that "a net-better outcome for everyone else"?
- vkou 4mo agoAnother possibility exists - the new one might well be less corrupt. Given that this one took nearly half a billion, it is, in fact, quite likely.