3 ms·
The stats come from the government agency in the US which tracks driver fatalities. Here's the source document: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/Vie
by lettergram 3mo ago
The stats come from the government agency in the US which tracks driver fatalities.
Here's the source document: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813800 https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/...
Regarding "distracted driving" causing cyclist fatalities, my point was more that bicyclists have a higher risk rate. If we're already going down this path for safety, banning bicycling would have a higher impact than reducing fatalities ~10% which is what the EU claimed it could prevent.
Regarding the claim that "pretty much all fatalities on bikes are the result of being killed by drivers", that's simply not true. It also largely depends on laws and location.
https://www.bikeattorney.com/bike-accident-common-causes.html https://www.bikeattorney.com/bike-accident-common-causes.htm...
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2011/05/20/136462246/when-bikes-and-cars-collide-whos-more-likely-to-be-at-fault https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2011/05/20/1364622...
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- etiennebausson 3mo agoI would argue that any U.S. government data is pro-car propaganda. For exemple, pedestrian killed by motorist are too often not counted as a motorist issue, but a pedestrian at the wrong place issue.