3 ms·

again, you're approaching it from perspective "both sides get caught" being a possibility when in actuality the choice is between "both sides steal" or "one si

again, you're approaching it from perspective "both sides get caught" being a possibility when in actuality the choice is between "both sides steal" or "one side steals" and allowing both sides to steal is in no way better --- the main way desired "both sides get caught" state becomes a thing is after "one side" splits in two - still being close in horizontal connections to stabilize, but with developed instruments for either half to guard against the other

grvbck 3mo ago
No, I tried to be pretty clear that "at least one side got caught" is not always better than "nobody got caught" if corruption dictates who gets caught.
- NooneAtAll3 3mo ago
  it's not corruption that dictates who gets caught - it's power balance crying about oppression only leaves you stuck in "everyone steals" state