8 ms·
I disagree. Keeping people alive longer without slowing aging would be economically costly, but a cure for aging would be a huge economic boon. Right now, it's
by time_management 18y ago
I disagree. Keeping people alive longer without slowing aging would be economically costly, but a cure for aging would be a huge economic boon. Right now, it's a huge cost center for our economy, both in terms of medical expenses for those far down the road, and also the loss of experienced people. I think the economic benefits would offset the population pressure.