3 ms·

You forgot the bike lanes that take up road space but nobody uses. Every socialist mayor's favorite anti-car policy.

• stackghost 3mo ago
  >You forgot the bike lanes that take up road space but nobody uses. Where I live (city in the PNW), bike lanes see heavy use year-round.
  • TacticalCoder 3mo ago
    Where I live there lots of little hills: the city is made of lots of hills. Even with electric bikes, it's really horrible to drive in the city. But you see bicycles on the bike lanes, lots of bicycles. When it's summer time and when it's not raining. Otherwise the people are all in their cars.
  • shermantanktop 3mo ago
    Where I live (also a city in the PNW, with a lot of hills) bike lanes see heavy use during the weekday morning commute, and pretty spotty use every other time of day, and during the weekend. Amsterdam is a different kettle of fish entirely. That's what I'd call "heavy."
• deleted 3mo ago
  [deleted]
• frollogaston 3mo ago
  That's the classic. City is not friendly to bikes or peds, they add bike lanes, city is not friendly to bikes peds or cars.
  • unfitted2545 3mo ago
    Cars aren't friendly to cities
• Sabinus 3mo ago
  "Just one more car lane bro it'll fix congestion this time I swear."
  • drnick1 3mo ago
    Yes, because removing car lanes while car usage is growing (due to demographics and urban development) it totally the right approach.
  • frollogaston 3mo ago
    Some cities really do have enough road for the population