3 ms·
Ah. This makes more sense to me. I believe the issue here is with the terminology, and (as usual) poor reporting. So what you are saying is that the author is
by teilo 14y ago
Ah. This makes more sense to me. I believe the issue here is with the terminology, and (as usual) poor reporting.
So what you are saying is that the author is objecting to that view which limits one's understanding of the universe to a fixed-state system.
- nessus42 14y agoIIRC, the author didn't even really object to the computational model (aka "Newtonian Schema"). He just argued that it should not be the only one taught, as the "Lagrangian Schema" has some distinct advantages.