3 ms·
#1 is a net-better outcome for everyone else than doing nothing.
by vkou 3mo ago
#1 is a net-better outcome for everyone else than doing nothing.
- palmotea 3mo ago> #1 is a net-better outcome for everyone else than doing nothing. You kill some corrupt guy, just to replace him with another corrupt guy who's in the leader's good-graces. How is that "a net-better outcome for everyone else"?
- vkou 3mo agoAnother possibility exists - the new one might well be less corrupt. Given that this one took nearly half a billion, it is, in fact, quite likely.