3 ms·

Hmm, keeping the server-side code proprietary is rather underhanded. Was the license of the "leaked" code actually proprietary? Anyway, sounds like the "leak" w

Hmm, keeping the server-side code proprietary is rather underhanded. Was the license of the "leaked" code actually proprietary? Anyway, sounds like the "leak" was in the public interest.

pastk 4mo ago
The code in question was in Apache 2.0 repo and DCO signed agreeing its a public contribution. Please see my post above for details.