5 ms·
Dave always points at them as "bad" because they can be better in other places. But ignore the bit of "why not both"
by marysol5 4mo ago
Dave always points at them as "bad" because they can be better in other places.
But ignore the bit of "why not both"
- ajsnigrutin 4mo agoI mean.. that's like putting solar cells in the shade... i mean sure, they work better in the sun, but why not both? They still produce a few milliwats of power in the shade too. For the amount of money spent here, we could've build quite a few kilowatts of power capacity on more traditional surfaces, like if the project had to be rail related, on eg. roofs of rail platforms.