4 ms·
Why?
by minimaxir 4mo ago
Why?
- bt1a 4mo ago[flagged]
- all2 4mo agoTime-cost for machines instead of willing knowledgeable humans. The former requires money, the latter requires passion. Arguably, passion for a project is without price.
- zero1009 4mo agoSomeone pays for the AI? That's the new human maintainer.
- bloppe 4mo agoHypothetically, maybe. In practice, probably not.
- CookieCrisp 4mo agoIf it's valuable enough to someone, and it isn't keeping up, someone will pay. If it's not valuable enough for someone to pay, then who cares?
- jpfromlondon 4mo agoPlenty of important things have been born of passion without necessity.
- nozzlegear 4mo agoWho will pay if someone, somewhere is not passionate about it?
- throw1234567891 4mo agoYou can spin up a model locally and pay yourself. Who will maintain the project if the passionate sole maintainer burns out?
- inigyou 4mo agoWhich model works well?
- all2 4mo agoQwen 3.6 27b at q6 works decently well on 24GB of VRAM
- nozzlegear 4mo agoI strictly use only local models, so I agree, but the project was built with Fable so my argument hinges on the assumption that the maintainer is going to continue using Fable and needs to pay for it.
- jack_pp 4mo agoHumans have time-cost too, much higher than machines. Considering SOTA right now, for a project like this it would make more sense for the community to contribute and verify tests, sponsor updates with $.
- wild_pointer 4mo agoTrust