2 ms·
One way of reading this is an article about how good Anthropic's product is. "Look at how many serious flaws users have been willing to accept in order to keep
by ngriffiths 4mo ago
One way of reading this is an article about how good Anthropic's product is. "Look at how many serious flaws users have been willing to accept in order to keep using this thing"
- m_ke 4mo agoModel is the product, people will put up with anything as long as you're on the pareto frontier of performance x cost.
- skydhash 4mo agoWork as long as you’re the only one (or the few) in town. Nad giving it for free (or nearly free). I have Cursor and when I use it, I keep it to auto, never caring about which model I use.
- anematode 4mo agoIt also contextualizes the urgency of their attempts at regulatory capture. Once Chinese models have the same capabilities, there's almost no reason not to use them.
- gck1 4mo agoIF they were light years ahead of competition, then that would make sense and would be a perfectly valid strategy. But it's not, so you're burning very important bridges that you may need in 3-4 months.
- ngriffiths 4mo agoFair, but it's hard because falling behind on the models themselves is a killer. Maybe they're saying they can't spend resources on anything except staying ahead.