4 ms·
A group having more power has little to do with numbers. If that was the case the rich would be more numerous than the poor, and India would be the most powerfu
by coliveira 3mo ago
A group having more power has little to do with numbers. If that was the case the rich would be more numerous than the poor, and India would be the most powerful country in the world.
- throw-the-towel 3mo agoThe "power" of a country, however you define it, lags the population growth. China was the biggest country for decades, its power only really started exploding some 10 or 15 years ago.
- giardini 3mo agoAnd now its power is declining rapidly. Peter Zeihan "Don't be Surprised by China's Collapse": https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DmqA5NODRnQI&ved=2ahUKEwjbx4ClwLyVAxWdmSYFHa5IEXYQwqsBegQIHBAB&usg=AOvVaw13_A1x9GwAk5gILdWiSWCl https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=8997844...
- coliveira 3mo agoThat's an incredibly short sighted way of looking at countries. The US was never the country with highest population growth, and right now is also heading into a demographic collapse.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]