4 ms·
I don't disagree, but there's another side to this. It's happened in print for years - a review in June, a double page spread ad in July. But it damages edito
by AlexMuir 14y ago
I don't disagree, but there's another side to this. It's happened in print for years - a review in June, a double page spread ad in July.
But it damages editorial integrity and it dilutes genuine content. In print this doesn't really matter - there are huge barriers to entry, and newcomers are more likely than anyone to do it to make it easier to score revenue.
Online though, if I suspect that [blognamehere] are plugging something shit for profit I'll just go elsewhere for my news. It doesn't cost me a penny, and there are infinite other options.
- mirkules 14y agoGreat point. Once you buy the magazine, the money is spent, whether you like it or not. Although, it should encourage you to not buy anymore. On the flip side, printed magazines would be so prohibitively expensive without adverts that nobody would buy them, so I guess in print it's a balancing act between alienating users via too many ads or cost of the magazine.