3 ms·
Why would new astronomy infra pay for the Starlink's negative externalities? Yeah it turns out that "divvy up finite resource" is actually just an intrinsicall
by estearum 4mo ago
Why would new astronomy infra pay for the Starlink's negative externalities?
Yeah it turns out that "divvy up finite resource" is actually just an intrinsically nightmarish problem when it's something no one intrinsically owns, didn't create, but needs nonetheless, like water and land.
- brookst 4mo agoWell if you build a new telescope where there are already satellites doing their business with no objections, shouldn’t you be required to pay for changes in their business, if the principle is first claimant?