3 ms·
Do you mean 11 years is a "long" time? I'd say it doesn't matter how long it was - it ended up better the expected based on the miles, and since it was a high-m
by foxglacier 3mo ago
Do you mean 11 years is a "long" time? I'd say it doesn't matter how long it was - it ended up better the expected based on the miles, and since it was a high-mileage-per-year car, that supports the claim that degradation is determined (at least more than expected) by calendar years, as cgyv.. claimed. I don't see how it doesn't support his claim.
- defrost 3mo agoIt's all moot speculation in the absence of any firm notation of what cgyvbunji considers "calendar age based degradation" to be.
- cgyvbunji 3mo agoThe battery industry defines calendar age degradation, not a random guy on the Internet like me. It's like saying you can't discuss voltage without me defining what voltage is.