3 ms·
The comment above is (I would guess) about the eleven years of original battery usage rather than the mileage. The implication being that runs counter to the c
by defrost 4mo ago
The comment above is (I would guess) about the eleven years of original battery usage rather than the mileage.
The implication being that runs counter to the claim of "calendar age degradation".
- foxglacier 4mo agoDo you mean 11 years is a "long" time? I'd say it doesn't matter how long it was - it ended up better the expected based on the miles, and since it was a high-mileage-per-year car, that supports the claim that degradation is determined (at least more than expected) by calendar years, as cgyv.. claimed. I don't see how it doesn't support his claim.
- defrost 4mo agoIt's all moot speculation in the absence of any firm notation of what cgyvbunji considers "calendar age based degradation" to be.
- cgyvbunji 4mo agoThe battery industry defines calendar age degradation, not a random guy on the Internet like me. It's like saying you can't discuss voltage without me defining what voltage is.