This article is the usual self victimisation rut but it comes with an interesting irony. The article states the often quoted Wages vs Productivity gap. But wa

This article is the usual self victimisation rut but it comes with an interesting irony. The article states the often quoted Wages vs Productivity gap. But wages didn't track productivity for the simple reason that the top 10% of people were paid much higher and consume disproportionately higher. Who do you think the top 10% mostly comprises of? White collar people. So the article mourns for the same people who were responsible for and benefactors of the wage vs productivity pay gap LOL. Hard to take this seriously.