4 ms·
Anyone afraid of being laid off at google right now? Perhaps this is a backup :)
by DeepYogurt 3mo ago
Anyone afraid of being laid off at google right now? Perhaps this is a backup :)
- Cthulhu_ 3mo agoI think if you get caught exfiltrating data they'll sue you for much more than $200K.
- the_real_cher 3mo agoIf your money is in private crypto or offshore you have nothing to worry about.
- mock-possum 3mo agoExcept perhaps jail time. Lying about your assets to avoid paying a lawful fine is criminal. Just because they can’t see your money doesn’t mean they can’t prove that you have it, and can’t jail you for hiding it to get out paying a fine.
- LearnYouALisp 3mo agoGoogle, Amazon, and FB: It's not me, right
- LastTrain 3mo agoSo is stealing
- zuzululu 3mo agoi'd strongly caution anybody foolish enough to go down this path financial watchdogs and international treaties make it impossible unless you are perhaps a multi billionaire who can afford to buy people at the political level
- merpkz 3mo agoCopy data into extra large capacity micro sdcard and hide it in your rubiks cube, nobody will suspect a thing
- takipsizad 3mo agoI wish an extra capacity SD card was enough, google books holds (probably) an insane numbers of books
- stephenlf 3mo agoComments on the source mention dataset sizes ranging between 1.5PB and 200PB
- takipsizad 3mo agomy guess would be the 7PB mark
- cydodon 3mo agoFor 200PB one would need 25kg worth of 2TB microSD cards... that would be lots of Rubik's cubes =P
- diab0lic 3mo agoIt’s the “ Copy data into extra large capacity micro sdcard” step that gets you caught. Nobody is stopping you from leaving with an SD card or USB stick at Google.
- Velocifyer 3mo agoImportantly, this would work way better on a speedcube than the rubick's brand cubes. Never use the rubick's brand rubicks cubes. I use the Moyu RS3m V5 maglev, and I think that it would work well for hiding uSD cards.
- imhoguy 3mo agoI don't think anybody would do it purely for money. I would rather see someone who is terminally ill and decides to do some "good".
- dlenski 3mo agoThere are not too many mentally-sharp, fully-employed, terminally-ill people that I have met. Even fewer at tech companies. And even fewer who are single and childless. (Google would likely go after the estate of anyone who did this.)
- bitmasher9 3mo agoI wonder how hard they would press an estate. It’s bad PR to go after widows and surviving children, and the data has already escaped. This is something they’d want to settle quietly, so the family would have leverage.
- tumdum_ 3mo agoThey’ve made so many terrible decisions already. Going after widows wouldn’t change anything.
- gpm 3mo agoI wonder how hard Google could press an estate. For a living person the main consequences would be criminal, not civil, but you can't go after a dead person criminally. Civilly it's not really clear to me that Google would have been harmed enough to create noteworthy damages. The book publishers might actually be the bigger problem. They'd have civil copyright infringement claims with giant statutory damages.
- AlexeyBelov 3mo ago> It’s bad PR to go after widows and surviving children Do you think they care? People with cancer are often laid off from companies. Sometimes a bit after their diagnosis becomes known to the company.
- 3mo ago
- mmooss 3mo agoI'm sure they'd go after you, but hypothetically: What damages would they claim? They still have the data, which isn't their IP to begin with.
- shevy-java 3mo agoGood point. But it would still be a breach of Google policy, most likely and they signed a pact with the devil so ...
- Aachen 3mo agoSui generis database rights
- mmooss 3mo agoIs that some sort of real thing, some significance in law?
- Aachen 3mo agoYes You could look it up and see for yourself. It's applicable to all sorts of collections such as map data and I'd presume also a book database but IANAL so best if you see for yourself - my intention was just to point out (what I hope is) the applicable legal principle for anyone curious about this
- mmooss 3mo agoI don't know about that ... HN is a conversation. It's not a very interesting conversation when you say a few words and then refuse to say more, telling the other people at the table to look it up. I could look up lots and lots of things to see for myself. I wouldn't be reading your comment, and there is not enough time in the universe. Readers don't have time to look up everything other people post. It's up to the commenter, I think, to say what they intend and what's valuable about it.
- 3mo ago
- shevy-java 3mo agoI think the problem is more that financial damage would result from this. So people would need to be prepared to relocate to another country probably.
- IncreasePosts 3mo agoDoubtful that random employees just have access to the full archive. And among those few that do have access there are probably automated systems that will catch you once you start downloading even a small percent of the content
- jezzamon 3mo agoIf you want to get fired / sued for leaking internal info, you should at least aim for 1 million (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/google-employee-polymarket-insider-trading.html https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/google-employee-polymarket-i...)