4 ms·
If you product is CDC based (peerdb) you don’t want storage to support this :) This architecture is better for OLTP because all maintenance operations are move
by nikita 3mo ago
If you product is CDC based (peerdb) you don’t want storage to support this :)
This architecture is better for OLTP because all maintenance operations are moved to storage AND it has all other benefits such as LTAP that emerge from having a scalable storage.
- saisrirampur 3mo ago;) sounding good on paper vs how it works in practice (supporting demanding real-time OLTP/OLAP workloads) are completely different ball games. Separately, I understand taking care of it at storage level, but still don’t get “unifying storage” or “zero copy”. Anyways, I’ll stop now. Good to see all the innovation happening on converging OLTP/OLAP front. Each with a different approach and perspective. :)
- ronfriedhaber 3mo agothis is all so funny, gl to everyone