2 ms·
The comment was about the accuracy of the sensor, not about raising CO2 levels across the globe.
by jaapz 3mo ago
The comment was about the accuracy of the sensor, not about raising CO2 levels across the globe.
- jameshart 3mo agoSure. It just draws attention to the fact that a throwaway piece of advice for checking calibration of a CO2 sensor is ‘it should read 400-450ppm outside’ when a few short decades ago that advice would have been ‘it should read 300-350ppm outside’. It’s like if someone said ‘you can check if your chatbot’s news feed is complete and up to date by asking it for ‘recent mass shootings’. There should be two or three in the past seven days’. It’s true and a valid methodology but holy crap does it say something dark about where we are.
- colechristensen 3mo ago[flagged]
- youarenaive343 3mo ago[flagged]
- jameshart 3mo agoIf faster plant growth were the only side effect you might have a point here. Boy, it sure has been hot this month, though.
- squibonpig 3mo agoNice bait