3 ms·

But is trusting the CEO worse than trusting newspapers? Argument of Casey was that it is not.

• pwdisswordfishq 4mo ago
  Trusting a rando who claims to be the CEO of a company nobody heard of is worse, yes.
  • SanjayMehta 4mo ago
    [flagged]
    • svat 4mo ago
      No they are not, which is why Wikipedia doesn't rely on them. All information on Wikipedia is supposed to be verifiable via a reliable secondary source (books, newspapers, etc from publishers with a reputation), so anything written by any editor can, if unverifiable, be removed by any other editor, anonymous or not.
      • baranul 4mo ago
        Agree. That's what some people seem to not understand or overlook.