4 ms·
Any source for that “Apple just doesn’t care”, as opposed to thinking there are security/privacy tradeoffs or other considerations that cut against such a featu
by brookst 3mo ago
Any source for that “Apple just doesn’t care”, as opposed to thinking there are security/privacy tradeoffs or other considerations that cut against such a feature?
- crewindream 3mo agoOk, apple does not care, but gives “security/privacy” consideration as a public reason for not doing anything.
- Y-bar 3mo agoIf Apple can store the sms/iMessage, and email history, and health/journal history, and my Wallet payment history, in a safe manner I would think Apple can store notification history in a safe manner. How would notifications be meaningfully different from these? I think the proof of Apple’s level of care is in their lack of attention to this issue.
- DANmode 3mo ago> How would notifications be meaningfully different from these? Ephemeral transit layer owned by third-parties constantly, vs cold storage of secrets your architecture owns from start to finish.
- Y-bar 3mo ago> Ephemeral transit layer owned by third-parties constantly This is a good description of SMS and RCS.
- DANmode 3mo agoand also a good description of Apple APN notifications being pushed to a Garmin watch, or a car, or your off-brand earbuds.
- Y-bar 3mo agoWhich, again, is not meaningfully different. Yet it seems you insinuated so. Can you explain in detail?
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- kakacik 3mo agoIf they cared, they would give user triple confirm option to choose for example. Oh wait this is apple, they always know whats best for the user and do the choices for them, even when wrong. So all is as expected
- wwind123 3mo agoWith modern cryptography techniques, Apple could certainly do it if they cared enough. I guess the potential benefit doesn't justify the potential effort and cost related to the change, from Apple management point of view.